The Culture Beat

April 5, 2008

Grassley to televangelists: Pardon the cliché, but show me the money

Filed under: Faith Issues,Politics,Television,The Church — Culture Beat @ 2:27 pm

money.jpg

If televangelist Benny Hinn wants to say that Adam traveled to the moon, the law can’t touch him. Hinn has every right to teach wild stuff.

The same goes for Kenneth Copeland and Creflo Dollar. If they can find a way to twist an obscure verse in Psalms to justify a fleet of Rolls Royces, there’s no earthly law to stop them.

And if Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa is launching a doctrinal witch hunt from the Senate, then I would stand with unorthodox televangelists, a copy of the First Amendment in one hand and a bottle of Pepto Bismol in the other, to defend their right to be wrong.

But if preachers are using the First Amendment to hide fraud or evade taxes, then somebody should hold them accountable. If churches or donors won’t do it, then maybe it’s up to the government.

Last November, Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, wrote to six ministries, asking dozens of questions about their expenses, treatment of donations, business practices, oversight and compensation for leaders.

The ministries under the microscope include Benny Hinn Ministries, based in Grapevine, Texas; Joyce Meyer Ministries, Fenton, Mo.; Kenneth Copeland Ministries, Newark, Texas; New Birth Missionary Baptist Church/Eddie L. Long Ministries, Lithonia, Ga.; Without Walls International Church/Paula White Ministries, Tampa, Fla.; and World Changers Church International/Creflo Dollar Ministries, College Park, Ga.

grassley.jpg

Why these ministries? Grassley (pictured here) said he received information from watchdog groups and local news investigations that made him wonder if the organizations were hiding something, and so he began an inquiry. He gave the ministries a March 31 deadline to respond.

Predictably, some ministry leaders and supporters cried foul, saying the committee breached the First Amendment’s separation of church and state. But Meyer’s ministry answered the questions almost immediately, and three others later indicated a willingness to comply.

By Monday’s deadline, only Copeland and Dollar still refused to cooperate. They claim the committee singled out so-called Word of Faith ministries, which teach that faithful living – and giving – will yield financial riches now, not just spiritual riches in the hereafter.

Grassley, a Baptist, has been called a hypocrite, a persecutor of the church, a Judas. He said he’s just doing his job.

“I have an obligation to protect the integrity of U.S. tax laws,” he stated last fall. “If tax-exempt organizations, including media-based ministries, thumb their noses at the laws governing their preferential tax treatment, the American public, their contributors and the Internal Revenue Service have a right to know.”

What makes Grassley’s actions unusual is that it involves churches, according to Kenneth Behr, president of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability, a voluntary accreditation agency for Christian nonprofit organizations. But he doesn’t believe any First Amendment issues are currently at stake.

“At the heart of the questions are IRS tax issues,” he explained. “It’s not so much how much is paid, but if they’re accountable to anyone else.”

He has encouraged the ministries to cooperate with Grassley’s inquiry. (None of them is among the 2,000 ECFA members.)

“Accountability and financial disclosure are key ingredients to integrity,” Behr said, “and as a pragmatic issue, we should ask what’s the best course, with the least amount of damage. It’s easier to comply and then worry about legislation coming out of it, than to tempt fate by frustrating the process.”

With the deadline passed, Behr thinks the Finance Committee will now increase the pressure on Copeland and Dollar, launching a formal investigation. That’s “a whole new ball game,” Behr said, which could lead from subpoenas to new laws governing nonprofit ministries.

He would rather see churches and ministries regulate themselves. But, he points out, accountability among American religious groups is difficult. Compared to other nations, more American churches operate under local leadership, which is both a source of vitality and of potential problems.

“The U.S. has a tremendous number of congregational churches, which function with a democratic process, with members who give money and elect leaders for oversight,” Behr said. “At the same time, we have many personality-driven churches, many of them megachurches today. There’s Mr. and Mrs. Pastor who start a ministry because of their personality and charisma, their calling.”

While most such ministries work fine, many succumb to the dark side of independence and operate without any accountability.

“Every church in the U.S., regardless of ecclesiastical structure, should understand they need to be accountable,” Behr said. “It’s very biblical.”

First published in the Johnson City (Tenn.) Press. 5 April 2008.

10 Comments »

  1. The problem is that Grassley wants to make the DONOR’S names and how much they give PUBLIC. THAT is the problem here. The ministries have complied wholeheartedly with the IRS as per the LAW. The IRS has a privacy responsibility whareas Grassley has promised to PUBLISH all the DONOR’s PRIVATE INFORMATION. This is clearly DISCRIMINATION!!!!! He is stepping over the Constitution for his witch hunt. This is unconstitutional. I would like a look into Grassley’s checkbook!!!

    Comment by Linda — April 29, 2008 @ 11:42 am | Reply

  2. Yes, Linda you are right. This is one of Copeland’s main issues with the investigation as well. He wants the government to comply with the proper procedures as well as protect his congregation.

    Comment by Cole man — May 8, 2008 @ 5:45 pm | Reply

  3. Christian leaders are beginning to step up in support of the ministries. It’s good to see them coming together and realizing the future implications of this situation. Check this out…
    http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/religion/stories/050808fealivprobe.1daf55e.html

    Comment by Ty Zach — May 8, 2008 @ 5:46 pm | Reply

  4. I pray that the Christian leaders continue to support Copeland as this process continues. It’s good to see that there are others that see what this could mean for the future of other groups.

    Comment by Zack — May 19, 2008 @ 4:12 pm | Reply

  5. Copeland is still standing his ground and I believe he should. The bigger picture here is what Copeland is defending and that’s what we should be concerned with. The effects of this decision could be something to be feared. Copeland has also created a website to keep people up to date on all the latest…
    http://www.believersstandunited.com

    Comment by caplin — May 27, 2008 @ 4:52 pm | Reply

  6. If there is an issue with these organizations, then the proper procedures should be followed. Grassley has created a spectacle of this investigation by not going through the IRS in the first place. He also asked for trouble when he targeted ONLY one denomination. Copeland has some good points he is defending.

    Comment by CAM — July 1, 2008 @ 12:37 pm | Reply

  7. Copeland does have some good points, I agree. However I hope they are enough to bring the right decision. Grassley is pushing the limits as far as he can it seems. I do not see where some of the information he requested is necessary, and what he had planned to do with it.

    Comment by PatiencePays — July 1, 2008 @ 3:14 pm | Reply

  8. This situation has been going on for way too long. Grassley obviously mishandled the situation since day one. It’s apparent that he doesn’t have anything concrete to push it further. His camp’s recent nepotism angled attack on Copeland appears to be another example that they are grasping for things. It’s time to end this before any unnecessary precedents are made.

    Comment by monday again — August 18, 2008 @ 2:19 pm | Reply

  9. Lets Take a quick look. In Genesis the first job God gave Adam was The NAME MAKER. God makes a thing, Adam names it. Come closer GRASS-ley. What generally hangs out in grassy areas. That same deceiver that tricked Eve. The snake himself. As of right now I’m not referring to Sen. Grassley as a snake, give him the benefit of the doubt.
    If his true intent is to govern the laws and statutes as it pertains to nonprofit criteria. Then he’s honestly doing his job.
    On the other hand. If he and the so called watch dogs or whistle blowers, probably non-tithing cohorts, slither aroung the green pastures of preachers who have paid there dues for the success the currently so well deservingly have obtained.
    Do like my grandmother says when you spot a snake, take a stick and bust him smack dab in the head, and watch him wiggle silly, then he’ll bite himself to commit suicide.
    Let me show you the money. I use the K.I.S.S. clause. keep Information Simply Simple.
    Lets take my Bishop. Bishop Eddie L. Long. I commute from Columbia, South Carolina consistantly for wednesday bible studies and conferences.
    If Bishop Eddie brings in 1million-dollars annually, which is not enough for the magnitude of giving he releases constantly in the lives of those that hear and love him. taxed or untaxed he can still afford a $300,000.00 bently and a million dollar house.
    Im a contractor. a million dollar house doesn’t have a million dollars cash in it. Based on location-demographics, I can take and purchase property, buy building materials, brilliantly design a home 4-6 thousand square feet with about
    half million or less. Equity makes the home cost a million dollars, that doesn’t mean a million dollars CASH was spent.
    So if Creflo Dollar, Eddie Long makes this kind of money yearly, its not a hard task to own expensive items. its in there range.
    Anybody want to take a walk in the grass now. Wear your boots, and keep your audit-bite kits. email me for speaking engagements at wilson_irwin@yahoo.com age 37, have been preaching the word of faith for years.

    Comment by The Next MultiBlessinaire — October 31, 2008 @ 8:26 pm | Reply

  10. That email is. wilson_irwin@yahoo.com

    Comment by The Next Mulitiblessinaire — October 31, 2008 @ 8:31 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.